Ukip and the importance of understanding the concept of Acquis Communautaire

There seems to have been a great deal written in the papers this weekend about various “alleged” problems/scandals within Ukip and the many attacks on them from the Tories. This is interesting given that the local elections are upon us and arguably points to the fact that the Lib/Lab/Cons are absolutely crapping themselves about the increasing popularity of Ukip.

This is hardly surprising given how many broken promises Dave Cameron has dished out to the good old English public. His party have absolutely no back-bone, they stand for nothing, have no decent policies and seem to be doing virtually everything they can to ensure that Labour get back into power at the next GE. God forbid

Also, maybe just maybe, the sheeple electorate of this country are starting to wake up and see just how corrupt, pervasive and utterly dangerous the EU really is. It costs us over £50 million a day to be a member of that federalist super state club, and what do we get in return? Virtually bugger all. However, what we have got is: Unstoppable migration (granted not all of it is bad, a large portion of the workers who come here we need and they do a wonderful job) and more are going to be rocking up here soon when Bulgarians and Romanians join the EU in 2014. Some simple figures: Britain has a population of over 62 million people; Canada has a population of around 33 million people. Now if that isn’t crazy and a real indicator that we are full and need to stop people from coming here, I don’t know what is. Secondly, the majority of our laws are now made in Brussels and are simply rubber stamped by our kow-towing MPs. This means that we have increasingly sided over powers to the EU, lost our sovereignty and the ability to make our own rules. Moreover, the rules and laws that come from the EU are increasingly totalitarian and strip us more and more of essential freedoms and liberties, all in the name of progress and a collective unity with Europe. Thirdly, we have also been forced to shell out even more money to prop up failed economies who should never have been allowed to join the EU.

The Tories may claim that Ukip is little more than the party of “fruitcakes and nutters” and try to dismiss them as irrelevant. However, ask yourselves this. If they are so irrelevant, why have the Tories been so keen to point out all the issues with Ukip’s candidates and their vetting process? Me thinks the Conservatives doth protest too much.

I was watching Question Time this week – something I must stop doing as it ALWAYS makes me incredibly angry and does my blood pressure no good – because Nigel Farrage was one of the panellists. Whilst I am always impressed with the bloodied noses he gives to MPs from other parties, he slipped up big time this week and I found myself screaming at him, through the Television, to land the knockout blow when it came to the issue of renegotiation with Europe over immigration and a ‘better deal’ for Britain.  Unfortunately, he didn’t do it.

As usual the Conservative representative on the panel started blathering on about how his party would work tirelessly to renegotiate with the EU and make sure that Britain was given a bigger say in how it handles its own affairs with regard to Human Rights laws and such. To be fair Farrage did point out that this wasn’t possible, and that the Conservatives are always talking tough like this but it never comes to anything, but he should have said WHY it wasn’t possible.

Basically, it isn’t possible because when Tony Blair (as one of his last official acts as PM) and Gordon Brown flew to Brussels, in secret, to sign the EU treaty without ever giving us a say; they knowingly signed us up to the founding principal/law of the EU, which is Acquis Communautaire. This guiding law states that once a country has signed over powers and control to Europe there IS NO WAY that ANY of these powers or controls can be given back, except by using article 50 of the treaty which means you have to completely leave the EU. Let me say that again: ONCE THESE POWERS AND CONTROLS HAVE BEEN HANDED OVER TO BRUSSELS THERE IS NO WAY THAT ANY OF THEM CAN BE HANDED BACK, EXCEPT BY LEAVING THE EU.

Farrage, really should have hit home by saying it is impossible to renegotiate powers back from the EU because of Acquis Communautaire. Then he should have gone on to explain that to the people in the audience and at home. I would have loved to see the looks on the other MPs faces if he’d said those two magic words. It would have been priceless.

As it was he did point out that, contra to a recent report that said the numbers of Bulgarians and Romanians who were expected to come here was going to be lower than expected, thanks to his own research and talking to Bulgarians and Romanians, the numbers were going to be high and that the majority of those coming in the first wave would be criminals and people seeking to exploit our system. Then in the second wave it would be those with skills and genuine, decent people.

As regular readers of this blog will know, I am a supporter of Ukip, I like what they stand for, not just on immigration and the EU, but also in terms of their economic policy and more specifically their educational policy. They are the only ones who realise that a one size fits all education system doesn’t work, and so would reopen grammar schools and technical colleges for vocational students. They want to bring industry and manufacturing back to this country and not just rely on service sector. They want to introduce a single flat rate of tax, and most importantly, they are not trying to be centre ground politicians, trying to be all things to all people. You know where you stand with Ukip and I like that. Whether they would be as good as their word in power, who knows? However, given the absolute shambles our three main parties have made of the country, surely it’s time to give an alternative party a go.

Mick Philpott and why The Daily Mail was pretty much right.

First of all, let me be absolutely clear: my heart, thoughts and deepest sympathies rest with those poor children. Secondly, I do NOT believe that everybody on benefits is the same as that vile, monster and his wife.

The Daily Mail came under attack this week for claiming that the house fire murders in Derby by Mick Philpott were the result of our overblown welfare state. There was huge outrage because people (wrongly) assumed that The Mail was lumping all people on benefits together. This is simply not true. The writers’ of the article did state that they did NOT believe all recipients of welfare were monsters and scroungers, and that most were decent, hard-working people who had fallen on hard times. However, this point was tangled up in the middle of the article and, I think, should have been put right at the start of the story in bold letters as a disclaimer. That is the one fault I can find. The rest of the article I whole-heartedly agreed with. Though, I would go a stage further and argue that I don’t think what happened with Mick Philpott is just down to the problems in our welfare state. It is also a result of human nature.

You see what The Daily Mail were doing (and this is something I have been trying to do with this blog for a good while now) was to highlight the attitudes, cold heartedness, and deeply, irreversibly flawed mentality of an entrenched, hardcore minority of benefit scroungers and scumbags. Another point that so many people objected to was the fact that The DM had given out a figure in the hundreds of thousands in relation to how many of these hardcore scroungers were out there; they were up in arms about the fact that the paper had dared to suggest that there were so many hardcore benefits scroungers. However, this figure is the equivalent of the 120,000 ‘problem families’ that the government identified a year or so ago.  I might argue that even at such a large number that is still quite optimistic. These bleeding hearts were disgusted that the paper had dared to argue that Mick Philpott saw his children as nothing but a cash cow, and that this thinking and attitude was common within this hardcore group. Sorry, but the DM is absolutely spot on. Tragically, the mentality of Mick Philpott is very common amongst this particular section of the underclass. I have had some personal experience with these people and have friends and family who have also worked at the coalface with these vermin, and believe me THEY DO see their kids as little more than a cash cow. The majority of these kids are only born to provide bigger benefit cheques for their feckless, cold-hearted ‘parents’. I’ve heard countless stories from family and friends who work in social services of children that have been abused, neglected and tossed into care, children/teenagers who were pimped out by their parents to earn extra money - really sickening, heartbreaking stuff that NO child should ever have to endure. That I’m afraid is the reality with this hardcore minority of feckless, lazy scumbags. You may not like it, but the truth is often hard to take.

Interestingly, this article also threw up into stark clarity another blindingly obvious point, that I have been trying to make for a while now, which is that certain people should NEVER be allowed to have children. I have blogged and argued many times now, that we need to start seeing children as a privilege and NOT a right. Therefore, like all privileges, they should first have to be earned by demonstrating that you are worthy of having such a wonderful gift and responsibility as a child in your life. There should be strict criteria that each prospective parent should have to pass before being allowed to get pregnant – I’ve wrote about these before, so I’m not going to mention them here. To many my ideas would seem totally abhorrent and extremely draconian, but I’m afraid that if we want to stop as many children as possible from being born into such horrible, feckless families only measures as harsh as these will ever work (I realise that nothing you do will ever totally eradicate the problem. I also realise that children from better backgrounds can equally fall fowl of abuse and neglect, before anybody accuses me of elitism and snobbery.)

Another, very good point has been raised by Peter Hitchens today on his blog, which is that any decent society would have hanged Mick Philpot for the attempted murder of his ex partner. As Mr. Hitchens rightly points out, it was only the skill of our medics that stopped Mr. Philpott’s partner from dying, thankfully, which prevented that scumbag from facing a murder charge. As it was he served three years of a seven year sentence.

Regular readers of this blog will know I am in favour of the death penalty, precisely for cases such as that where the intention is beyond doubt, or where there can be absolutely no debate as to the guilt of the perpetrator. For those bleeding hearts, who would throw up their hands in horror at such a suggestion, think about this – had that vile piece of s**t been hanged, those six innocent children would, in all likely hood, be alive today.

As I have said many times, with people such as the Mick Philpott’s of our country, there is no help or salvation for them. Their mentality and attitude is such that nothing you do will EVER make the slightest difference to them. They are a deeply entrenched subhuman species – not entirely the fault of our benefits culture – it is in their natures. Therefore, until we grasp the nettle and realise what depths that group has sunk to and why they must be erradicated, I'm afraid more innocent children are going to be enslaved into lives blighted by those parasites and face similar attrocities.

Let me stress one final time that I do NOT believe that all people on benefits are out to scam the system, nor are they all sick and twisted. The VAST majority are decent, loving people, who are hard-working and trying to find work. The ones I target are that hardcore, entrenched MINORITY. There is a HUGE difference between the two camps.

This is why I'm a genuine fan of Eugenics

In all seriousness this vile chav and her ilk are the reason why I am 100% in favour of eugenics. These people can never and will never be helped and I'm afraid that, at best, these progressive bleeding-heart liberals will never understand that; at worst they will actively encourage them to breed so that the Labour party and their neo, progressive socialist cronies can have a steady stream of compliant, brainless, state reliant fodder.

I realise that the ones with this vile woman's attitude are only a minority, but they are a hardcore and deeply entrenched minority. They are the ones who are outbreeding honest, hardwork and determined people (the real and traditional working classes) and they need to be erradicated. I have blogged many, many times now on why it is so vitally important to get down into the gutter with these vermin, so that you can really understand the depths to which this section of society have sunk, and why they can't ever be helped. Only when people wake up to that bitter and sickening truth do you realise that erradicating them is the only option.

They are a plague on this world. I detest them and all they stand for. My life has been equally hard and painful, both physically and emotionally, and yes I had a period of being unemployed, but I hated it. It wasn't a lifestyle choice for me and I did all I could to find a job; I even worked voluntary for 2 years in order to keep my skills up and demonstrate a willingness to work. If I can do it with my disability, then many other sure as hell can. And if people like her are not willing to get off their backsides and work, when they are perfectly able to, then they are of no use to that society and should be got rid of. Sorry, but better luck in your next life my friend.

Let me stress here that I do not think or advocate getting rid of those who are genuinely sick or disabled and can't help through no fault of their own. Those people should be getting all the help, support and benefits they possibly can. Starting with this fat cow's benefits. Nor do I think that she is typical of the majority of unemployed people. Most unemployed people are there through no fault of their own and are desperate to find a job so they can contribute to society and their communities. As I said above, she is a prime example of a minority but hardcore subclass of people who have never had a job in their lives (probably 3rd - 4th generation unemployed) and DON'T EVER WANT TO WORK. Anyway, watch the video and see what you think.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2296893/Welfare-mother-Tracey-MacDonald-defends-right-buy-booze-cigarettes-ITVs-Daybreak.html The video of the interview is right down at the bottom of the article.


 

May God forgive me but for once I have to agree with Gideon Osborne on two very important point.

I can’t believe I have to do this, and it really pains me to admit this, but for once I’m going to agree with Gideon Osborne. I was watching The Andrew Marr show this morning and two of his guests were Ed Balls and Gideon Osborne. Now, as most regular readers of this blog will know I’m no lover of either Labour or The Conservatives (or The Lib Dumbs for that matter) so having to agree with a Tory is a very difficult and bitter pill to swallow.

However, Ed Balls was first on and that slimy, odious twit had the cheek to criticise Osborne for not doing enough to help the economy. This coming from the guy who was known to be Brown’s right-hand man at the treasury and was, therefore, arguably instrumental in helping to land Britain in the economic mess we are in.  Lest we not forget it was Labour’s 13 years of spending, borrowing and deregulating of the financial sector which helped cause such a monumental economic crisis back in 2008. A crisis which, in fairness, the Conservatives have done little to put right since they came to power in 2010. However, Balls (in his usual unintended hilarious manner) glibly mentioned that Osborne would fail his G.C.S.E economics exam. Then went on to say how if he was Chancellor would increase spending and borrowing for the public sector in order to kick start the economy. Jesus wept!

This is Labours’ fundamental economic problem, they always want to spend more money on the public sector and think that is the answer to all our financial problems. It isn’t! It is borrowing and spending money that we don’t have which has put us in such debt to begin with, and this lunatic wants us to do more of it! In addition, the presenter rightly pointed out to Balls that Britain had lost its triple A rating because it had failed to bring public sector spending down and was still borrowing too much. A fact which Balls simply couldn’t answer so tossed it aside. Never let the truth get in the way of your prepared message, aye Ed?

 When it was his turn to answer questions, Osborne rightly pointed out that borrowing and spending too much money was the strategy that Greece and Cyprus had adopted, and we should look at the real mess they are in now. He also mentioned that you can’t get out of debt and bring the deficit down by borrowing more money and spending it on things you simply can’t afford. Now, on those two points I have to agree with Gideon. You will never know how painful that was to write!

Yes, Ball’s ideas might sound good to the sheeple of the mass voting public, but to those of us who know a little bit about economics, we can see just how utter disastrous those kind of policies would inevitably be. Sure, we might have better public services (at least superficially better) for  a few years, but the cost of those would put us in exactly the same position as Greece and Cyprus are now within a decade or more. It would be a financial catastrophe, which would make both the 2008 crisis and 1930s depression   look like a jolly holiday. I kid you not.

Anyone who votes for Labour and Ed Balls as Chancellor in 2015 wants shooting. Having said that, let me be absolutely clear, I don’t think Gideon and Dave would be any better either.

How to deal with criminals.

This guy has exactly the right idea about how you should treat criminals. If there were more people like him running our justice system I would bet money that crime rates would soon start to tumble. Unfortunately, we are over-run with wishy washy, bleeding heart liberals, who think a warped and bastardised view of compassion is the best way to treat our underclass. If this guy was the Sheriff in my town I'd be voting for him over and over again too. Have a read and see if you agree:

For those not familiar with Joe Arpio, he is the County Sheriff of Maricopa County, Arizona. He keeps getting re-elected over and over again.

These are some of the reasons why:

 Sheriff Joe Arpaio created the "tent city jail" to save Arizona from spending tens of millions of dollars on another expensive prison complex.Inmates sleep in tents!

 He has jail meals down to 20 cents a serving and charges the inmates for them.

 He banned smoking and pornographic magazines in the jails, and took away their weightlifting equipment and cut off all but "G" movies. He says: "They're in jail to pay a debt to society not to build muscles so they can assault innocent people when they leave."

 He started chain gangs to use the inmates to do free work on county and city projects and save taxpayer's money. Men work in Pink "Clean and Sober" Shirts. Their underwear is also Pink!

 Then he started chain gangs for women so he wouldn't get sued for discrimination.

 He took away cable TV until he found out there was a federal court order that required cable TV for jails. So he hooked up the cable TV again but only allows the Disney channel and the weather channel.

 When asked why the weather channel, he replied: "So these morons will know how hot it's gonna be while they are working on my chain gangs."

 He cut off coffee because it has zero nutritional value and is therefore a waste of taxpayer money. When the inmates complained, he told them, "This isn't the Ritz/Carlton. If you don't like it, don't come back."

 He also bought the Newt Gingrich lecture series on US history that he pipes into the jails. When asked by a reporter if he had any lecture series by a Democrat, he replied that a democratic lecture series that actually tells the truth for a change would be welcome and that it might even explain why 95% of the inmates were in his jails in the first place.

 With temperatures being even hotter than usual in Phoenix (116 degrees just set a new record for June 2nd 2009), the Associated Press reported: About 2,000 inmates living in a barbed wire surrounded tent encampment at the Maricopa County Jail have been given permission to strip down to their government-issued pink boxer shorts.

 On the Wednesday, hundreds of men wearing pink boxer shorts were overheard chatting in the tents, where temperatures reached 128 degrees."This is hell. It feels like we live in a furnace," said Ernesto Gonzales, an inmate for 2 years with 10 more to go. "It's inhumane."

 Joe Arpaio, who makes his prisoners wear pink, and eat bologna sandwiches, is not one bit sympathetic. "Criminals should be punished for their crimes - not live in luxury until it's time for parole, only to go out and commit more crimes so they can come back in to live on taxpayers money and enjoy things many taxpayers can't afford to have for themselves."

 The same day he told all the inmates who were complaining of the heat in the tents: "It's between 120 to 130 degrees in Iraq and our soldiers are living in tents there too, and they have to walk all day in that sun, wearing full battle gear and getting shot at, and THEY have not committed any crimes, so shut your damned mouths!"

 Sheriff Joe was just re-elected for the fourteenth time as Sheriff in Maricopa County, Arizona.

 

Cautions simply won't act as a deterrent. When will these liberal, progressive elites wake up?

It might be a New Year but the same idiotic crap still goes on. Two beer thieves have been let off with a caution, which according to the judge will act as a deterrent and a warning to other would be thieves. Yeah right!

The pair were caught trying to take £140 worth of beer from the Sitwell arms in Renishaw. The quick thinking landlord pushed them down into the cellar, locked it and called the police. However, because they admitted their guilt and because it was a first-time offence, the Judge has let them off with a caution.

These upper class judges, who live in cosy, safe neighbourhoods haven’t got a bloody clue about what it’s like to live in the real world. Trust me ‘Your Honour’ this WON’T act as a warning to other thieves, they’ll just see it as an open invitation to go out and steal more, if all they’re going to get is a slap on the wrist and a caution. BLOODY WAKE UP YOU MUPPETS!!!!!!!

After the London riots I blogged a number of times about how, in order to deal with these scumbags, you’ve got fully understand the mentality of the vermin you are dealing with. To do that you have to first get right down into the gutter with them; you have to breath the same air, cover yourself in the same putrid shit, then and only then can you begin to understand how harsh and barbaric the punishments have to be in order to stop these scum from doing what they do. Applying liberal, civilised values to these people will simply never work.

For my money countries like Thailand and Singapore have it exactly right; they understand that the best way to deter would be criminals is by having punishments that put the fear of God into most people. Yes, to most western eyes they seem cruel and barbaric, but the simple fact is, they work most of the time (I realise nothing can ever be 100% effective)

Bring back public floggings and punishments that impart some real physical pain and a real sense of fear into would be criminals’ minds, and you watch the crime rates start to come down.

I am so sick of the namby-pamby, bleeding heart, progressive approach to crime in this country. Peter Hitchens wrote an excellent blog piece the other week about how the liberal, progressive elite are to blame for the worsening crime rates in this country. I don’t always agree with Mr. Hitchens, but I do on this occasion.

Merry Christmas, everyone

I would like to wish all my readers and followers a very merry Christmas and a safe, happy and healthy New Year.

As always, I hope next year will be better than this one and I take this opportunity to thank you all for reading my ramblings and for being kind enough to leave a comment. Even when we don't always agree or see eye to eye; I hope my responses are always friendly and polite and taken in good humour.

Until next year, enjoy the festive season and may peace be a blessing in your homes.
 Love and best wishes,
CC